Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

This IS NOT SURPLUS LANGUAGE FROM FREE ENTERPRISE AS QUOTED IN SEILA:

"and
“nothing in the statute’s text or historical context [made] it
evident that Congress, faced with the limitations imposed
by the Constitution, would have preferred no Board at all
to a Board whose members are removable at will.” 561
U. S., at 509 (internal quotation marks omitted)."

HERE, THE US CONGRESS PURPOSELY OMITTED THE SEVERABILITY CLAUSE!

Tell me the Facts, FFFacts:

HOW DO YOU KNOW (much less the 9 US Supreme Court Justices) THAT CONGRESS WOULD HAVE PREFERRED NO SINGLE DIRECTOR AT ALL TO ALLOWING THE SINGLE DIRECTOR TO BE REMOVABLE AT WILL?

BTW, I am enjoying our intellectual quest here! I hope you aren't getting mad or anything, that's not my intent!