InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 3642
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/20/2006

Re: None

Friday, 09/04/2020 6:50:34 PM

Friday, September 04, 2020 6:50:34 PM

Post# of 20689
“On September 2, 2020, a purported stockholder of Momenta filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Momenta and its directors, captioned Elaine Wang v. Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-01175-UNA. The complaint names as defendants Momenta and each member of the Momenta Board. The complaint alleges that the Schedule 14D-9 omits material information or contains misleading disclosures and that, as a result, (a) all defendants violated Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act, (b) all defendants violated Section 14(d)(4) of the Exchange Act and (c) each member of the Momenta Board violated Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The complaint seeks, among other things, (i) injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (ii) rescissory damages or rescission in the event that the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement have already been consummated, (iii) damages and (iv) plaintiff’s attorneys’ and experts’ fees and expenses. Momenta believes the claims asserted in the complaint are without merit.

Additional complaints may be filed against Momenta, the Momenta Board, Johnson & Johnson and/or Purchaser in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, the Schedule TO and the Schedule 14D-9. If such additional complaints are filed, absent new or different allegations that are material, Johnson & Johnson and Purchaser will not necessarily announce such additional complaints.”

https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/NASDAQ/momenta-pharmaceuticals-MNTA/stock-news/83205233/amended-tender-offer-statement-by-third-party-sc-t