Alas??? Dead?? forlorn???
Hmm. I suppose it is possible but the question is,
"Why all the litigation over a dead company?"
The likelihood is there's value in the IP, now in the form of patents. What's the number, 9 or 12 patents with another 40 odd in application?
I find it hard (impossible) to believe that people with the substantial money (accountant , lawyers, business acumen) of Wallen dont understand sunk cost. If his investment was lost, Sunk, why not walk away and file criminal charges against the former CEO? Why fight all the involuntary BR? If the company was dead and cost were sunk any businessman/accountant/lawyer would tell you forget it you're wasting your money and you'll get nothing in return.
That didnt happen. Both sides spent substantial money fighting for ownership. It's not likely they were fighting over the office furniture.
Why Sink money in clinical trials if a court could strip it from you?
It was open/subject to a court judgement unit Jan 2019. Montano lost..every time!
If you are the major stockholder (Wallen) in a company (Ventuis) that has been idle pending litigation and you win, Would you then just let it evaporate?
IMO, the questions raised on this mb are always the wrong ones.
I remain hopeful with reason. You go long
#420m to Zero
#IAM95%
