"
Furthermore, the fact that this PR continues to state that they are still adjusting the meter algorythms means that while the company has stated multiple times in the past that they had a test that works and works well, testing has proven that the test hasn't been meeting FDA requirements and that hopefully they are getting closer will any and all adjustments they have had to make since March.
"
They never stated here that the test doesn't work, only that they are improving it. Ask yourself this question with regards to this point. If they had say 95% accuracy and were trying to improve it to 97% would the pr fit? I think yes.
"
Furthermore, the fact that this PR continues to state that they are still adjusting the meter algorythms means that while the company has stated multiple times in the past that they had a test that works and works well, testing has proven that the test hasn't been meeting FDA requirements and that hopefully they are getting closer will any and all adjustments they have had to make since March.
"
This pr was about the saliva test. If you bang on a door and no one answers would you continue to bang on the door or go next door where you see activity and bang on that door? I think yes. Once the saliva test is authorized then would you go back and bang on the first door now that they understand that the technology actually works? I think so.
"In other words, they never had a test kit that worked in the sense of giving FDA required results, which to me, at this point, is fraudulent and given these facts, the PRs of March and Apri.l were misleading at best.
"
They didn't have saliva testing in March so why even mention that with regards to saliva testing? Makes no sense to talk about apples when oranges are the discussion.
"In other words, they never had a test kit that worked in the sense of giving FDA required results, which to me, at this point, is fraudulent and given these facts, the PRs of March and April were misleading at best.
"
You can't say they never had a test kit that didn't work. There is no way retail would know that. Also a company would get this far if they didn't have something that worked. Try not to confuse improvements
with t doesn't work.
Your post is generally a negative post that makes false assumptions on your part. I can understand your frustration. We all have it to some degree or other. It used to be "next week" then in 3-4 weeks, now its next month. So yes I'm frustrated but some of that comes from false assumptions made as facts. Everyone wants to get rich quick, That isn't going to happen here.
This post is my opinion of this morning pr and the response to it. I do not in any way mean to attack you or denigrate your opinion. I just disagree with a few fine points.
Why respond to your post only? I noticed this am that I ignored 23 posts. Ask your self this one question? Did I miss something important beside FUD? I think not.
:}
Were pulling for ya...We are all in this together.
