ERHC Energy Inc (ERHE)

[Julius Erving]

First of all: Badog, there still is a question open for you in post 340491.

“All that common sense adds up to 4/100 of a penny “

Indeed, you're right, bro! The share price doesn’t look like common sense at all. There is your answer!

What I unfolded in my most recent posts is undeniably common sense. Not in the least because it is, apparently, impossible to refute by anybody, because of the constant lack of any indepth, substantiated rebuttal.

So we're full circle here, again, for the fifth time. It is indeed the whole point I’m making: the share price is not reflecting common sense! I highly doubt though that this will forever be the case. What if TOTAL mentions anything on EEZ block 4, for example?

Maybe some keep on saying over and over again that the share price is always right, but despite the fact that this assertion is not true in general, it is certainly not in ERHC's case. This has been explained in previous posts.

Krombacher also rightfully remarked just a few posts ago:

“You can’t have it both ways…if shareholders don’t know what’s been going on for 2 years then neither does the market know, and so EMH does not work.”

The chance that ERHC is currently overpriced, is not that big.. eheh.

Only those that did true DD, and acted upon it, have a better and more substantiated judgement on the opportunities ERHC currently offers in terms of share price potential.

In my previous post I explicitly asked: “Read my recent posts again, and say specific where (if at all) my common sense does not add up, and rebutt it, substantiated. If possible of course, because it is quiet right now, awfully quiet!”

The answer that was provided:

"All that common sense adds up to 4/100 of a penny"

Checkmate! Just Crickets indeed... I feel like something substantial has been accomplished here by the longs.

And remember: I’m not the one that made the following absurd and debunked claims:

* You don't have to be a Major shareholder to "call the final shots" at a company...
* Even IF you are a Major shareholder, that doesn't mean that you can "call the final shots" at that company... (a simple deduction from the above.)
* The ones that are protecting "THEIR ERHC investment", aren't the Major shareholders...
* The ones that are protecting "THEIR ERHC investment", are in fact mostly helping other large shareholders... (a simple deduction from the above.)
* That group 1 has more indepth information about ERHC than group 2, and that group 1's judgement on the "current state of affairs" of ERHC is more substantiated than group 2's...
CHECKMATE. It’s not common sense to try to keep playing a game when you lost that very same game. Checkmate is checkmate.
So, all in all it is indeed more than very plausible that some betted on the demise of ERHC and now got burned beyond recognition. ERHC is not going to go bankrupt.

The longs have strengthened their credibility here in a sheer sensational way.

But despite this all, the 'alleged non-existing' shorters have no option but to continue to keep the share price down.

It will be in vain. If any news from TOTAL regarding EEZ block 4 hits the wire, the share price will reflect common sense fast! Then the people that betted on the demise of ERHC get what they 'asked for': an upward price explosion.

The Doctor of common sense just broke the backboard... Slamdunk!

In the meantime: Badog, there still is a question open for you in post 340491!

Cricket, cricket, cricket...