InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 230
Posts 15196
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/30/2005

Re: None

Tuesday, 08/25/2020 12:35:55 PM

Tuesday, August 25, 2020 12:35:55 PM

Post# of 403039
There was a paragraph that referenced 2 external articles:

Moreover, according to a recent screening of 5,632 compounds (https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-23951/v1), including 3,488 compounds that have undergone clinical stage testing across 600 indications, only 19 compounds were identified as having an IC50 in the nanomolar (<1µM) range, as Brilacidin achieved, when tested against SARS-CoV-2.



Obviously brilacidin was not part of this screening of 5632 compounds. This article was posted back in April. On a different screening we know out of 11552 compounds tested, brilacidin showed promise as a covid19 treatment. Can't wait to see how the peer review doc takes this info and hopefully bumps up Brilacidin's status

corona-repurposing@ime.fraunhofer.de - Bernhard Ellinger the corresponding author to that article

the above is all IMHO (consider this my safe harbor statement)

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IPIX News