Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

Thanks for taking the time to respond, I appreciate the dialogue! The "slam dunk" is only on the singular issue of: (1) Whether or not a Federal Agency run by a Single Director, removable only "for cause", by POTUS, violates the Seperation of Powers and is Unconstitutional.

Here is the quote directly from Seila,

"THE CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the Court ....
2. The CFPB’s leadership by a single individual removable only for
inefficiency, neglect, or malfeasance violates the separation of powers.
Pp. 11–30."

Here, we have two SINGLE MEMBER directors, where BOTH can only be removed "for cause" by POTUS, pursuant to their enabling legislation. I cannot see anyway for SCOTUS NOT to decide this issue, since they are asking for briefs and getting ready for oral arguments.

Do you see a difference in the structures of the two agencies that would allow for a finding that the FHFA IS CONSTITUTIONAL, under the Separation of Powers Doctrine?

So, IF SCOTUS does hear the case, and they decide the above issue, What REMEDY do you think they will do, if any?