InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 68
Posts 2026
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/27/2011

Re: None

Friday, 08/21/2020 12:08:45 PM

Friday, August 21, 2020 12:08:45 PM

Post# of 92702
Federal Court Rejects DEA Request To-Dismiss-Cannabis-Rescheduling .....

Hard to say if this court ruling will ever lead to anything positive ..... in light of our seemingly compromised D.O.J. ..... though it feels relatively reassuring to realize the Federal Court is ..... at least ..... listening !!! .....

And say whatever you will ..... but "Bud Genius" ..... stock ticker $RIGH ..... has managed to survive thus far as a non-reporting "shell" in a Cannabis-Hemp Market with exponential potential ..... once the political "straight-jacket" has been removed .....

A multitude of concerned people have discovered by now ..... that Cannabis-Hemp industrial uses ..... have been estimated at an excess of 25,000 ..... which gives visionary Corporations such as "Bud Genius" ..... along with many others ..... ample opportunities to find a comfortable niche in the sector ..... with attractive Market demand ..... once Congress begins to ..... finally ..... "work-for-the-people" ..... leaving the "Nixon-Era" of "well-orchestrated repression" ..... in the dustbin of history .....

Something the electorate has been demanding for many years now ..... with an alleged ..... recent 70% approval rating ..... while the "People" will have a golden opportunity to make their voice heard this coming November 3 !!! .....


Federal Court Denies DEA Request To Dismiss Marijuana Rescheduling

August 19, 2020 ..... by Kyle Jaeger

A federal appeals court has denied a request from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to dismiss a lawsuit challenging marijuana’s current classification under federal law.

Scientists and veterans sued the federal agency in May, arguing that the legal basis DEA has used to justify keeping cannabis in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional. They asked for a review of its decisions to reject rescheduling petitions in 2020, 2016 and 1992.

While DEA attempted to quash the suit by asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to dismiss the case, the judges said in a filing on Tuesday that the “government’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is denied without prejudice to renewing the arguments in the answering brief.”

Shane Pennington, an attorney representing the Scottsdale Research Institute (SRI) in the case, told Marijuana Moment that, given the court’s response, “we fully expect a 9th Circuit panel to consider our arguments on the merits.”

Petitioners have raised questions about DEA’s reliance on scheduling standards that they feel are arbitrary and misinterpret federal law. In particular, they are seeking reviews of the agency’s claims that marijuana must be strictly scheduled because, the government has claimed, it has no currently accepted medical value and has not been proven to be safe.

They also argue that another statutory policy DEA says necessitates marijuana being strictly controlled is unconstitutional.

In its past denials of rescheduling petitions, the agency has asserted that marijuana can only be placed in either Schedule I or II. But the plaintiffs said in an earlier filing that the statute justifying that determination is “an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority” that “violates core separation of powers principles” by granting the attorney general authority to schedule drugs on his or her discretion based on an interpretation of international treaty obligations.

This isn’t the first time that SRI has taken the feds to court over their marijuana decisions.

The institute, which is among several dozen applicants to become a federally authorized manufacturer of cannabis for research purposes, successfully forced DEA to issue an update on the status of their application processing and then got the Justice Department to hand over a “secret” memo that DEA allegedly used to justify a delay in deciding on those proposals.

A bipartisan group of lawmakers sent a letter to DEA on Tuesday, demanding that the agency “expeditiously” finalize rules to license more marijuana growers for research purposes.

In a separate lawsuit against DEA, medical cannabis patients challenging the federal prohibition of marijuana are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to take their case after a series of rulings in lower courts since the original lawsuit was filed in 2017.

Read the federal appeals court’s denial of DEA motion to dismiss the marijuana case below:



https://www.marijuanamoment.net/federal-court-denies-dea-request-to-dismiss-marijuana-rescheduling-case/?mc_cid=4121d2edb2&mc_eid=4e4291d709

Best Wishes