InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 1224
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2014

Re: None

Saturday, 08/15/2020 10:31:43 AM

Saturday, August 15, 2020 10:31:43 AM

Post# of 140474
Reply 113438 MX77 - I can speculate. Depending on the answer as to who bought: I don't think it matters. Someone owns more than 18%. If it's not MDT - then the new player creates a new dynamic in the competitive landscape. That information most likely creates additional attention to TMDI, which may cause buying from new sources. Or, more buying from existing sources. Call it FOMO, or momentum IDK IDC. Some of the ways to make TMDI more expensive to own is increased valuation of IP, new awarded IP, execution of milestones for further proof of concept of Sport, or the competitors in the Med Device space decide to try and get a piece of TMDI. Right now if ANY of the competitors care to make this ugly, they buy. When TMDI is sold those who own get more cash, or own MTD stock. Either way its a more valuable asset. JMO. Driving down the price, IDC. I know this race will eventually end. Don't know the course of action, but it will end. The IP and proof of concept dictate the rules because the Med Device market already exists and the value has been established by safer outcomes from a better mousetrap than what ISRG offers. JMHO. The rest is fear mongering, wrapped in a shroud of cautious language because of the history of TMDI. IMO. I'm aware no investment is 100% safe. I ask anyone thinking of investing please be aware. If there's a better potential robot on the horizon please tell us, so we can be better informed about the competitive landscape and this investment. Anyone????? The mic is open. Thank you. Regards, BK