TOMZ I was reading this as a discussion of Q2 numbers not Q3. IIRC they said they had beaten Q1 numbers 6 weeks in. That would line up well with 8 million for the first 7 weeks of Q1. The wording of course was horrendous and I could see where you would assume it was Q3. If that was the case though they were in fact prepared to discuss numbers. Why deflect any questions on revenues if you already made comments on revenue?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.