gnulnx
Well per what he has said, here is how I see it so far. He is getting inside information from "sources" about a facet of company business that is not public information and right now can not be verified. That information could cause a dramatic swing in PPS true or untrue as we have seen from the "reliable" rumors of an early filing this year.
This is not speculation he is talking here, he is presenting it as reliable fact from "someone" close to the company whom does not want to be known or he does not want to be known. If that is the case, I am sure that "person(s)" would not appreciate the fact that he eluded to them here. I would also hope that his "firm" would not wish him to be involved with it either, which he has referred to as well to gain credibility.
I do not believe that the SEC would appreciate any of it either since he received the information and is actively trading the very stock he has inside information on.
I am all for getting to the bottom of the pile and pulling out the truth, but to post such information that can not be verified is not only unethical, but as he has presented it, true or untrue, could be illegal.
I have yet to see one post where he has done what he said he was here for ("hold the companies feet to the fire"). He posts of inconsistent and non-corrected PR's etc. etc., but yet I do not see one post about how he called to confront Ron or Paul about it. His fire is not even a lit match right now. But he wants us all to ban together?
If half of what he is saying is the truth and the company really wanted to do something about it, all they would have to do is pull a list of certed shareholders that cashed in, point out the posts, perhaps do a little investigative work and let the SEC handle it. Probably not even worth their time, but if the information turned out to be true, I would sure want to know where insider information came from and why would that person protect his friend and not blow the whistle while profiting from it. True or untrue, it does not look good to be playing with and he has been trading for near or over 3 decades?
This sure is a lot of concern for a penny stock after 3 decades of trading experience when he has already profited from it. He will show you how he wants you to perceive he got bagged, but does not want to and/or can’t back any of the talk up so far.
Sure as shooting though, he will respond and argue a point he knows a little about and question everyone else while skating around anyone questioning him.
Just my opinion. If he did migrate over there, he can respond without worry of being deleted for crossing a narrower line. I do not and have no reason to hide behind another alias there. I edited all my initial thought to try to insure I did not cross that line here.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
