InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 511
Posts 59400
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/21/2009

Re: Gman3343 post# 62483

Wednesday, 08/12/2020 8:00:13 AM

Wednesday, August 12, 2020 8:00:13 AM

Post# of 75050
Gman I hope it works out for ya. What.....

makes me so skeptical, among other things is the fact that these guys have never "started from scratch" if you will on finding a wreck.

Their projects have consisted of previously explored areas they paid to explore/salvage. They came in after the fact when basically nothing had been found. A cannon, pistol, and some platters doesn't make for a ship wreck. HTQ found those items, not Seafarer's.

Regardless, these guys have never found anything significant since inception. In other words, they've NEVER proven themselves to be salvors.

Either the Melbourne site is junk and they lack the expertise to figure it out, or the wreck is there and they lack the ability to find it.

Over 2 decades on a very small area is beyond laughable when you consider they have absolutely nothing to show for it.

And why has Kyle changed his tune from we're on the wreck to it came to rest at the base of a hill to if the wreck is there?

That is very irresponsible. You're conclusions should be based on facts. There is no facts to support that conclusion, which is why Dr. Baer or the other PA's have not come to conclusion.


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SFRX News