So according to your new story, which is always changing, you never "took it on the chin" as you now claim to have made $600k whereas "taking it on the chin" was described by you as losing $200k.
Wouldn't that make you, by definition, a liar? Steady Kicker over there said he believed you, and that he didn't need supporting evidence.
So why would you buy at $2.00 if you are shorting at $1.50 from overseas? How is that logical?
And why would you accuse Zac, in the last conference call, as "shorting" his own stock, when, in fact, you now claim that you are shorting the stock. And IFFFF we did believe this new story, without a shred of supporting evidence, wouldn't that by definition make you an active participant in market manipulation, since you were making accusations on teh written record which you knew were not true, while at the same time shorting the stock and pretending to be angry?
Which story should we believe, if any, from you?
