InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 1309
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/17/2013

Re: prophet2 post# 94733

Monday, 08/10/2020 2:27:57 PM

Monday, August 10, 2020 2:27:57 PM

Post# of 133138
Hi Prophet, yes you're correct and I am aware of the staggering and yet conservative (hard to believe) infringement $ #'s presented by VP. I say conservative because VP took 1/10 the standard % for establishing infringement amounts and it still came to the amounts you referenced.

I think that Email would definitely agree to something like that as it would provide and establish a springboard to more and potentially larger licensing/sale agreement not just here in the US, but globally as well. I think a win here is almost, as if not more important, then the $ amount attached.

There is also a list of over 60 potential infringers on the hook who've been notified years ago (Cisco, microsoft, all the biggies). IMO, a pro-vplm settlement here at any level and the VPLM sale price would go through the roof.

Emil did turn down $150 mill already (think that is $.08 pps), but I think he'd tempted to cash out right around a billion and start enjoying things. At least I would anyway.

Thank you Prophet, be well!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News