InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 75
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/28/2019

Re: imtheshadow post# 625485

Monday, 08/10/2020 12:39:51 PM

Monday, August 10, 2020 12:39:51 PM

Post# of 795693

So you are saying that Bush DIDN'T take 80% of all future profits with the warrants?



Warrants were common practice for distressed financial institutions at that time. The NWS negated the ability of F&F to retire the loan, and take action on the warrants. If not for the NWS, the loan would have been paid back in full, and the warrants could have been sold back to F&F at that time. Agree or disagree with Bush Admin actions, it was the NWS that locked F&F into perpetual debt to UST and conservatorship.