Saturday, August 08, 2020 11:19:28 AM
Though block 11A in Kenya had a smaller projection than that of our block 4. We negotiated a 35% carry on block 11A. Had CESPA hit commercial oil find there, ERHC and shareholders would have been richly rewarded.
So if Block 4 could be considered more prolific than 11A, why would Peter (SEO) want a measly 100. million plus 5%? Just doesn't make sense to me at all.
A more likely deal would be $300. million plus 25-35% carry. Tell me why or why not?
This higher return on block 4 would put ERHC in the CASH drivers seat to maybe be an operator in some of the JDZ blocks OR...?
I doubt SEO is likely to do a giveaway on any of ERHC blocks..He's an experienced businessman with proven successes and , After all , ERHC is his step-child that puts his reputation on the line.
Just my opinion. I'd like to see ERHC prosper and have a continued business life in the oil patch.
Recent ERHE News
- Form SC 13G - Statement of acquisition of beneficial ownership by individuals • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/06/2024 07:31:22 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/08/2023 09:06:42 PM
PickleJar Unveils Latest Venue Managed Services Innovations in Upcoming Webinar • PKLE • Aug 23, 2024 1:11 PM
Element79 Gold Corp Provides Update on Nevada Portfolio • ELMGF • Aug 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Maybacks Adds Award Winning Show to Its Lineup Discusses Maybacks Opportunity • AHRO • Aug 22, 2024 11:30 AM
North Bay Resources Announces First Gold Concentrate at Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Assays 12 oz/ton Gold, 17.5 oz/ton Platinum, and 8 oz./ton Silver, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Aug 22, 2024 10:28 AM
All Things Mobile Analytic, Inc. Reports Major Growth with Over $11 Million in Revenue • ATMH • Aug 22, 2024 7:19 AM
Unitronix Announces Strategic Entry into Cryptocurrency Space • UTRX • Aug 21, 2024 10:00 AM