lucmariepierre Sunday, 08/02/20 05:22:57 AM Re: janice shell post# 17629 Post # of 17656 I think your point of view is similar to others massive views from holders But the recevership is still for a good reason and justice and holding was agree to pay later than 2003 part possible from both or everything if economical improvment from trust holding inside their advice monetary I mean still a possibility but after many many years the receiver is for shareholders all and kept safe this possibility despite of course you are sceptic : fluffy is just an good or bad advisor and Michael Jackson also but in musical broadway theater In France we had such different stories bad or good they impressed the heart view Regards only Luc