InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 49
Posts 46
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/25/2017

Re: doogdilinger post# 32950

Friday, 07/31/2020 5:01:00 PM

Friday, July 31, 2020 5:01:00 PM

Post# of 63074
Thank YOU, Doog. You've been "the light" for many who are seeking it here. My family, friends, and colleagues are very grateful for your contributions. That goes for everyone else I mentioned in my first post as well. I appreciate all of you.

To all who are reading this, PASO is going to move up, HARD...and when it does, count your blessings that you even know PASO exists. I won't attempt to guess at a valuation once the dust settles, but know this, if you've got more than 50,000 shares (and you can hang on TIGHT, even when the tide gets rough ahead), I'm of the opinion that your life will never be the same. I'm not saying that you shouldn't have an exit strategy, because I certainly think you should, but with that strategy should be a certain number of shares that will ride to the moon (after you've recouped you initial investment and gave yourself a lil payday).

I challenge you, all of you right now, to look at some companies that were NOTHING CLOSE to this big, and see how their stock touched the stars from pennies on the dollar. What did they have? Were they working with several BILLION dollar entities? (TransUnion, UST Global, SiriusIQ (tied to Microsoft), Availity!?) Or was it just hype and excitement that drove it to dollars on a patent or clinical trial that went over well? Maybe all it took was one "insider" to tell the press they've managed to secure a medical/technical breakthrough...and BOOM! Sky high. If those stocks were able to reach dollar land, just wait till the curtain drops on this sucker.

"Ah man, all this sounds great, but how can you be so sure?" Listen, if I KNEW for certain this was going to $5 or even $0.50, I would have already exhausted the rest of my savings, sold the cars, the house, and the cat. But as I mentioned earlier, I studied Risk Analysis at a first class university. There will always be some level of risk, but you can use the totality of circumstances to make educated decisions. Which brings me to decision trees. There's usually only two branches at each tree. In this case, one branch I stand to lose roughly the median annual salary made United States...The other branch, potentially securing my financial freedom in my 30s. Sounds like a risk worth taking, yes?

The DD is out there for all to see. This deal just got bigger than our heads may be able to get around. TRU registered HealthyAmericaTM-->HealthyAmericaTM is going to be leveraged by/a component of CLX--> CLX is the conglomerate/consortium/JV that involves the likes of UST Global, SiriusIQ, Availity, TransUnion, and others--> CLX has an ACTIVE LOI with PASO as the RM candidate. There.... dots connected. In fact, screw dots....it's a solid friggin line IMO.

I don't have all the answers, but the risk analysis based on the FACTS has my decision tree heavily weighted on the branch that leads to success. What are the percentages applied? Well, you generally do apply a percentage to the probability of those outcomes. I'm not going to do that here because I don't need people calling their banks right now to wire out their kids college funds to dump into PASO (or possibly selling because maybe the percentages I applied aren't good enough to roll the dice on). Just know that I have great confidence that we are all in a very good spot right here, right now - real time.

My tune will change significantly if the LOI is terminated with PASO. Well, it's still active and CLX (or anyone else involved for that matter) could have come to the table to push for a different direction. Why have they not terminated? BECAUSE THE PLAN IS STILL TO RM INTO PASO.

Gotta get my kids some dinner. Cheers.