InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 5198
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/06/2018

Re: ipiros post# 92312

Saturday, 07/25/2020 2:05:38 AM

Saturday, July 25, 2020 2:05:38 AM

Post# of 104562
Priority #1 for a legitimate CEO would have been to learn how to tune the reactors well enough so that they could take business from Nanosys in the display market because reactors are a more efficient way than batch production and you can undersell Nanosys.

Displays, SSL, and anti-counterfeit are ready made markets. Instead they try to force feed this app onto people with no market for it.

I'd say it is an insane way to do business. But then I look at the obvious bait and switch India contract filed with the SEC and I see scam written all over this. At this point, he looks like he is having his marketing consultants try to insult shareholders' intelligence on top of it.

Outside of marketing consultants and shareholders who is going to buy this app voluntarily? Who do you think is going to be forcefed testing and the app? No one is going to want to piss off customers or voters. I'd like to know who thought up this hairbrained idea which would only work with a higher death rate? This just can't be serious (if it ever was).

And no one finds it odd these "industry disrupting" displays were AWOL from the CES?








































?
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.