InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 83
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/11/2006

Re: 06mets post# 74372

Wednesday, 12/20/2006 10:41:53 PM

Wednesday, December 20, 2006 10:41:53 PM

Post# of 203990
Mets;You never answered my question ?

concerning the financings,don't say
"so what your saying is " if I didn't say it.

You should know that the equity options were always contingent on Xechem's ability to pre-pay the note,and once again,Xechems survival depended on these loans...

In other words they could have paid the note. Just like this last one. They were loaning cash when the pps was much higher than it is now !
can you say RISK ?

check link; 8% ..XKEM could pre-pay

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/919611/000114420406044200/v055926_8k.htm

So did your 'group' offer better terms ?????
now,i'm laughing....

p.s. youd better be careful what you say,howard becker is an attorney;

I know all about Blechs past,what is true is that there would be NO Xechem without him !!!

now lets move on to real info.



winwarz

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.