InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 62
Posts 10251
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/03/2008

Re: IPwatcher post# 89271

Wednesday, 07/22/2020 2:47:09 PM

Wednesday, July 22, 2020 2:47:09 PM

Post# of 97081
This board is fortunate to have your expertise here, although it seems that the ones that need it the most, don't even ATTEMPT to understand it. "Go DECN, FDA Approval ahead! Thanks CBS!", is the closest I see to debating you....lol

"The thing about impedance is, whenever you change the amount of water that there is there, you also massively change all of the impedance backgrounds, signals and sensitivities.

Since Berman is intent on using the sampes as they present, i.e. without beffering or further dilution, that is a big - and I would in fact say - insurmountable - problem."



It amazes me that anyone could own this POS after reading your posts. No one EVER contradicts your take with data (because there is none). Typical of pinks/grays, is when shareholders don't understand it, they just ignore it. They think of this as a lottery ticket, but it's a losing one.

I often wonder, what % of Berman's issues are that he just doesn't understand the science (ignorance), and what % is he says "well I'll just say this, and since this is the gray sheets, my shareholders won't have enough expertise to question it". OF course, we'll never know for sure, but just to guess, 30-70?