BRK Announces Filing of Substantial New Litigation Seeking USD$38.99 Million
HENDERSON, Nevada, June 11, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- BRK, Inc. (the "Company") (OTC:BRKK) wishes to inform its shareholders that further to the judgement obtained by BRK against iSee Automation Inc. ("iSee") in the State of Washington, which judgment and award has since been entered in the Province of Ontario, Canada, BRK filed an extensive new legal action today in the Province of Ontario, Canada seeking damages totalling USD$38,991,250.00. The litigation seeks to further address historical actions against BRK resulting in substantial losses to BRK Shareholders.
Mr. Michael Kovacocy, Head of Corporate Development and Investor Relations stated: "Following counsel on this matter, BRK shall publish further details including full legal submissions at a later date and as required by various regulatory bodies."
Mr. Daniel Serruya, CEO of BRK further commented: "Our litigation strategy is sound and offers a stronger likelihood of both obtaining a satisfactory and material judgement for shareholders, and also collecting on said judgement. This is driven both by the fact that a material basis of this claim has already been established and ruled upon by the courts in favour of BRK. Furthermore, as part of our due diligence, we retained professional services to ascertain the liquidity of the defendants, and it is our view that success in this legal action will likely lead to timely and substantive recoveries."
BRK Inc. (OTC PINK: BRKK), established in 2008, is owner of the Helmet Camera intellectual property (patents-pending) that make the RefCam possible. With the acquisition of the live broadcast helmet camera patent, BRK is poised to enter sports marketing in a big way. iSee Sports Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of BRK, Inc.
————————————-–
I need to find the suit number. Somebody posted the actual case number on the BRKK board
The last paragraph is a JOKE. “...is owner of the Helmet Camera intellectual property (patents-pending) that make the RefCam possible.” I believe any technical fluent person would instantly see their SCAMCAM cannot and DOES NOT EXIST without VisLink. PERIOD
I’ll go look for the case number. I spent a couple of hundred paying counsel to find it in the wrong Provence
