InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 810
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/13/2005

Re: Eddie T post# 45779

Saturday, 07/18/2020 2:55:01 PM

Saturday, July 18, 2020 2:55:01 PM

Post# of 50023
On the damages maybe a 10-20% but then they would have to provide evidence that they have refused to provide for the past 12 months.

On setting aside the judgement. Next to ZERO since they still have not provided the information they were ordered to provide.

Judge Brannon was already considering and had written an opinion to Judge Middlebrooks to consider a Default Judgement before Osario withdrew because of their refusal to comply with the courts orders. So far Rontan et al is trying to act like the only thing they did was miss this one event. The Judgement was not due to the one event as was made clear in Judge Middlebrooks order. It was an accumulation of all the events. This one just made it a lot easier. I see nothing in the Rontan filings that even tries addresses the other material deficiencies that led to the Default Judgement.