Friday, July 10, 2020 10:09:08 PM
This is not correct. Federal claim court is dismissing direct claims where as regular federal courts are dismissing indirect claims (may be except 5th Circuit). So Judges are utterly confused on how to apply regular laws to FHFA conservatorship.
Judge Lamberth used porky logic to uphold lawless FHFA conservatorship decisions knowing very well unconstitutionality of HERA and most other opportunistic Judges chose to blindly follow Judge Lamberth.
Fellow Travelers created HERA/FHFA as un-natural frankenstein law/agency to do things that would not been possible under regular executive agencies allowed under the constitution.
FnF cases should have reached SCOTUS on unconstitutional grounds long time back, but plaintiffs wasted time on litigating technicalities even when Judge Lamberth hinted clearly about constitutional issues.
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM
VPR Brands (VPRB) Reports First Quarter 2024 Financial Results • VPRB • May 17, 2024 8:04 AM