Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX)

[cybermich]

Well I think false logic is making a comparison (when you say show me a company that received a grant without lobbying - which basically includes all small bios) - making a comparison where there is NO precedent.

In fact, you can take all known small bios - and they do not have what IPIX has.. NOW go ahead and include medium and large bios to the mix:)

I have posted the following before: The decision makers depend on the "credibility" factor to make a decision. Large and some medium Bios have a list of things that add to the "credibility" factor - and therefore make it easier for the decision maker to justify their decision (especially if it fails) - IPIX on the other hand has to work a little harder to make it easier for these decision makers to stick their necks out.. Third party validation, Good data, Peer Review publications.. THESE things give IPIX enough credibility that when a decision maker gives their stamp of approval it is not just them betting on a "penny stock" and all the baggage that comes with that.

Is that too hard to understand?

This same logic follows a CEO who wants to make an offer for a company like IPIX - the CEO answers to a Board and must justify his/her decision. Decision makers lose their jobs NOT by passing on a potential deal, but by MAKING a deal that goes south (and then not being able to justify that decision.

So bottom line, yes, a company like IPIX will need to probably jump through a few more hoops.. is it fair?.. maybe no.. but at least it is understandable if you look at it from a decision maker's pov.