Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[wlfr01]

The argument continues to circle around the fact there has been no data published.

Some continually fail to recognize the credentials of the people associated with the SeaSearcher project.

Others attempt to mock the people associated which in my opinion weakens their position.

I for one believe; that, if P&S can figure out how to manage the slosh of liquid fuel in the space shuttle fuel tanks so the rockets stay lit while transitioning into zero gravity have the skill sets to figure out working at depth in salt water.

Discounting the collaboration between P&S and Wild Manta is voiding any debate of common sense. Working at depth in salt water is not novel.

Discounting that P&S and Wild Manta do not have the software or hardware skills to manage the platform is laughable, but a few continue.

The board can keep beating their heads against the wall and tantrum like a four year old, but the adult in me and years in technology tell me the opposite.

Give me one good reason why SFRX should share any data or performance with anyone outside the project? The answer is, no responsible respondant is able, and why, because no responsible technology company would never do such a thing. Why is SFRX held to a different standard?

I believe the walls are closing in on those with weak arguments and those who take enjoyment in attacking the people and companies involved with no merit.

I for one am encouraged by what I see and read. I continue to believe regardless of the outcome of Melbourne, SFRX has possibly set themselves up with a technology platform that will serve the shareholders for many years to come. I have read nothing or found any data point that tells me the collaboration should not be anything but positive.

I believe the people and the companies involved have the skill sets to do exactly what they have told us they are doing. Yes, one day they will have to show the world what they can do, but that will be with results and not the data some continually cry about.