InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 61
Posts 6687
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/21/2013

Re: ano post# 618412

Saturday, 07/04/2020 1:28:49 PM

Saturday, July 04, 2020 1:28:49 PM

Post# of 795735
The FHFA has, as Sweeney stated, schizophrenically argued both sides of the coin

Court #1- That they are NOT an agency of the govt (Sweeney)

Court #2- That they ARE an agency of the govt (Collins)

Court #3- That 4617f bars any judiciary review and federal courts have no jurisdiction to even look at what we do (Lamberth)(and most others)

Court #4- EnBanc rules unconstitutional

Court #5- On hold awaiting SEILA CFPB (SCOTUS)
Outcome - UNCONSTITUTIONAL

(r)Court #5- (SCOTUS) now free to dismiss govt request for dismissal

i.e .......EnBanc STANDS
WE WIN

Remanded to lower court for remedy, correct?

Sweeney 5th circ US court of appeals now does what.......

Does she take Collins enbanc, SCOTUS and run with it?
Continue with 6 yr discovery and 2022 Fairholme trial ?

Did Lamberth ever get the full production of docs as ordered?

Does any of it matter because RRR on its way regardless due to election worries?