InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 10763
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/14/2018

Re: youngster-moon post# 105307

Friday, 07/03/2020 9:49:26 AM

Friday, July 03, 2020 9:49:26 AM

Post# of 145200
This is pure hogwash.

The judge quotes "of great or substantial value" because the judge was stating the words of the plaintiff. In the same document, the judge lays out the rational for not directly opining on this assertion (no jurisdiction), and also that it is irrelevant because of the many factors that necessarily render the contracts useless.

That is here:



And therefor, the judge rules against the relief sought by the plaintiff. Note- if the judge agreed, it would have been lawful to grant the relief sought, making the assertion that the judge agreed with the plaintiff all the more ludicrous.



Posting (72) out of context and using it as evidence that the court sided with the assertion WHILE REJECTING the relief sought in the case the assertion were true is on par with a gentleman receiving a vm from a woman like this: "Please stop calling me. You're repulsive. I would consider dating you only if you were the last man on earth", and editing it to play "I would consider dating you" and sending that to his friends as evidence she was interested.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.