Followers | 15 |
Posts | 1517 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 05/11/2012 |
Tuesday, June 30, 2020 3:23:42 PM
Paid in full means that their whole claim must be paid off.
There is a difference between both of these terms. Now, this being said, what was the original percentage that the creditors had agreed? If I recall it was lower than what they have now been distributed.
So, I can't figure out why the court just keeps on giving them a higher percentage than what the original POR was offering. Plus , why are the CT's interest payments being halted for more than the 20 quarters that were mentioned in the prospectus? Isn't this a breach of the covenant?
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Bulk Sample, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 11, 2024 9:15 AM
One World Products Issues Shareholder Update Letter • OWPC • Sep 11, 2024 7:27 AM