InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 10840
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/14/2018

Re: youngster-moon post# 105208

Monday, 06/29/2020 9:10:13 PM

Monday, June 29, 2020 9:10:13 PM

Post# of 145516
This has been addressed many times. The judge was saying from the point of view that the plaintiffs the contracts had value. And the judge said that the court would not opine on whether it agreed or not. The point being it was irrelevant because the secured creditors did not remotely support pursuing.

The context in which the judge addressed this after after the bankruptcy was closed, due to a shareholder, like yourself in disbelief over the outcome. The truth is, DURING the bankruptcy, when the bidders could bid on and buy whatever they wanted, nobody wanted the contracts you are referencing.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.