InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 813
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/27/2018

Re: SK510 post# 198598

Thursday, 06/25/2020 10:35:11 AM

Thursday, June 25, 2020 10:35:11 AM

Post# of 205098
it may show intent, but it isn't the way you state it, example:

ok, so reread taguchi complaint, section 1, notes 37-43, and while it says she was not aware of some patients and says she didn't believe the full 120 allergens tested was necessary all the time, no where does it say there were billings for tests not given.

per complaint, accused of:

37. aryc has test running for 120 type allergies tested.
38. taguchi ok to work with gov
39. admit to guilt. statement not medically necessary to test for 120 each time. schena falsely uses her med # to submit claims. schena submits false docs to regulatory bodies to certify lab.
40. aryc client services manual addressed, question validity of claims in it.
41. consultants paid commissions to offer aryc test to patients
42. aryc used taguchi to per #39, order tests for patients wo skin conditions or contraindications for a skin test that would make it necessary to use a pin prick vs traditional skin test for allergy.
43. billing data, says aryc billed medicare 5.9 million and private insurance 63 million. was paid $290k and $2M+.

that's it. no claim of 'billing for tests that were not even given"