InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 76
Posts 7208
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/02/2011

Re: Mark102 post# 20525

Monday, 06/22/2020 4:08:33 PM

Monday, June 22, 2020 4:08:33 PM

Post# of 43522
It was a motion from JCP. The previous motion was MOTION AND MEMORANDUM OF CERTAIN UTILITY COMPANIES TO: (A)
VACATE, AND/OR RECONSIDER, AND/OR MODIFY ORDER (I) APPROVING THE
DEBTORS’ PROPOSED ADEQUATE ASSURANCE OF PAYMENT FOR FUTURE
UTILITY SERVICES, (II) PROHIBITING UTILITY PROVIDERS FROM ALTERING,
REFUSING, OR DISCONTINUING SERVICES, (III) APPROVING THE DEBTORS’
PROPOSED PROCEDURES FOR RESOLVING ADDITIONAL ASSURANCE
REQUESTS, (IV) AUTHORIZING CERTAIN FEE PAYMENTS FOR SERVICES
PERFORMED, AND GRANTING RELATED RELIEF; AND
(B) SEEK ADEQUATE ASSURANCE OF PAYMENT

They were seeking an emergency relief. Now it looks like they are withdrawing the request for emergency relief?
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.