DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[stakddek]

Grateful: I have no problem with the excellent effort you made. I wish I could have worded as cogent a letter. I believe it is a courtesy to advise the company, and though not mandatory, and we have freedom of speech and a right to protect our investments, it's always good to let the folks at DNAP know what we say and how we feel. I think it's a case of it can't hurt to let them have a copy. Now if a private reply was made to you, or me from such an endeavor, I would keep it so, if it truly was a private reply. This is one of those gray areas brought about by the internet. Snail mail would of course be just a "lookee here" letter from you to ABC about xyz and you wouldn't blind carbon ABC. And if you got a "thank you for your concern" back from xyz you could pretty much figure it was a form letter they send to everybody who writes in. Case closed. But now with the immediacy of the internet, you can get a lot higher in a corp. by knowing an e-mail address. Probably to do with quicker review of the e-mail. And the old form letter may be cut and paste with an additional personalized comment. (which is a lot better I think. But letting the subject know there is conversation ongoing about it, provides the subject an avenue to correct any misinformation, or misaprehension that may arise. Your letter did not contain anything that I could see would be misconstrued or misread and taken to mean something other than a straightforward advisory to someone who wasn't aware of the good works of Doctor Frudakis. I again laud and bravo your effort. Just think the company should have a copy of the letter as a matter of courtesy. You do what you feel is right. I would send them (DNAP)a copy of my correspondence, if even to a news reporter.

I remember previous post from Carey long time ago that essentially said go for it. You did, and the letter you posted here did us all proud. Thank you.

Stakddek