Monday, June 22, 2020 12:22:46 AM
Precisely...
I thought you said you were in a related industry and read the expired patents.
That sounds to me like large scale Kronos emitter wires and collector plates mounted in the exhaust stream of an industrial plant. Sort of a giant air dog stuffed in a chimney. Someone here challenged me to find comparable or newer technology, I provided verifiable proof, that there are plenty of other much larger companies out there with their own newer variation of this age old technology, and this is the best rebuttal you've got? Perhaps you should spend more time educating yourself on the principles behind the technology you are defending, and less time threatening to tattle tale on others that are raising legitimate points of concern that don't agree with your desired outcome. Starting to look like this is your failure, not mine...
Please do, and who is making fraudulent claims? Oh, I did mis-speak by a couple years throwing out a nominal number, it hasn't been quite 15 years. let me correct it for the record...
From the filing: For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008:
But as long as you are reporting to the company. Would you please have them clarify and produce documented proof that they received notice from the USPTO last year as per the company filings stating that all patents are in good standing. Because as you can see from each and every link in the post, that goes directly to the USPTO data base. The USPTO seems to be under the impression, that Airworks and Tessara still own all of the original patents, they are almost 6 figures behind on maintenance fees, and I'm sure the USPTO would appreciate them fulfilling their financial obligation to the agency as long as they are utilizing the patents. And if they have been paid up to date for almost a year, and the patent office dropped the ball, they need to get it corrected ASAP to put all this hearsay to rest so that investors know exactly who owns what, in the patent department.
And while you are at it, ask why the A/S has changed to 2B on NV SOS with a filing, but the OTC markets is still showing 500M(which you should be doing anyway, because if they aren't the ones that filed it, don't you think the company would want to know about it?)
Also as long as you are emailing them, enquiring minds still want verifiable proof as to the origin of this claim, exactly how it was determined and by whom?...
Because, that is a definitive statement of absolution. And if they can't provide documented proof, that some global authoritative entity made such a determination, that would seem to be a fraudulent statement and false advertisement in and of itself. Don't you think?
Recent KNOS News
- Form C-AR - Annual Report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/01/2024 01:31:27 AM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/16/2024 01:39:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/05/2024 05:59:31 PM
- Form 1-A/A - Offering Statement [Regulation A]: [Amend] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/10/2023 02:06:27 PM
Transforming Alzheimer's Treatment: Innovative Combinations to Boost Cognition • PFE • Oct 2, 2024 9:00 AM
Unitronix Corp Unveils Cryptocurrency Investment Portfolio Strategy • UTRX • Oct 2, 2024 8:40 AM
Integrated Ventures, Inc Reports Total 2024 Revenues Of $5,863,935 vs $3,862,849 for 2023. • INTV • Oct 1, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Signs Letter of Intent to Acquire Los Angeles Cooking School, Integrating Automation and Robotics with World-Class Culinary Training • NGTF • Oct 1, 2024 8:30 AM
ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) To Commence Trading Today • COOP • Oct 1, 2024 7:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp secures loi for launching tailings reprocessing business in Arequipa, Peru • ELMGF • Oct 1, 2024 6:38 AM