That's an interesting story.
So, that means you must think Zac is a good operator, contrary to earlier testimony on this board.
Why not offer them $20M like you allegedly did before? What are the terms going to be? Why should they accept your money now if they declined it last year?
Is the $5M to save your $200,000 loss which you "took on the chin?" And how exactly is 4% of 5M taking it "on the chin"? 4 percent is of course assuming $5M is your entire net worth and that you lost the other $15M you allegedly offered last year. Just to give you a high 4 percent "chin" number.
Are we going to get any supporting evidence of this alleged meeting when it happens, or do we just have to take your word for it? In the next conference call, could you ask Zac publicly and on the record about the $20M you offered last year and the $5M you will be offering? So that we can get him on the record denying or affirming your testimony? Certainly nothing to lose on your part since you want us to believe this, right?
