InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 607
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/08/2020

Re: None

Saturday, 06/20/2020 8:09:39 AM

Saturday, June 20, 2020 8:09:39 AM

Post# of 16680
Omar 8- I know EI and Texas keep disagreeing with me, but, that's OK. I'm not trying to make friends, I'm more interested in making money. The last sentence, NNLX own words!! Re-read it... They don't have the mojo to get private equity to give NNLX millions or getting someone to pony up millions in a licensing agreement when that company has all the skin in the game. These are extremely big hurdles that I don't believe NNLX can jump over. It was a good thought but I don't believe its ever going to happen. It appears more of the same!!!!

"Feb. 28, 2020

Response to Coronavirus Queries both International and US

The Company continues to receive calls inquiring about Coronavirus (COVID-19) testing capabilities.

While we believe our technology could be used to develop a rapid test for the Coronavirus, based upon preliminary development work done for detection of proteins associated with Ebola in 2014, we do not have the resources to pursue development of a Coronavirus rapid test. There are a small number of BioSafety Level 4 labs in the US (4+/-) where development work on dangerous viruses can be done and their calendars are booked months to years in advance with daily costs that can run into tens of thousands of dollars. The Coronavirus may be a short-lived phenomenon that is no longer an issue within a few months; there are other tests that exist that may deliver reliable results in a few hours or a day, and while a test we develop may potentially deliver results in minutes, it may not be viewed as worthwhile in a cost:benefit analysis by various agencies or institutions.