Just have to use some common sense here. Do you think its more likely that this is a report with old "research" (which a simple good search will reveal this research has been packaged up several times for sale), or that the author of the report is the first to break non-public information that the suspended/delisted company has re-emerged?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.