InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 80
Posts 11047
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/25/2017

Re: Agreg post# 31904

Wednesday, 06/17/2020 12:33:18 PM

Wednesday, June 17, 2020 12:33:18 PM

Post# of 35275
It's a win win either way for Namaste.

Namaste still owns 49%, & is owed the loan back plus interest or converted shares/controlling ownership.

I trust Meni's judgement on this. If he says Brad is not in the best interest of namaste, and he has other strategic options w/ Labz or other routes, I think it's the right decision.

Like I mentioned, I'm fine with a little short term pain for a better longterm solution that works best for namaste.

Overall, unfortunate it played out this way and it's taking longer than expected to see the new revenue, but it most likely is the right move given Brad past behavior and performance. What true professional takes to Facebook to say such, after he obviously f'd something up to cause the q1 impairment charge?