InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 4518
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/28/2006

Re: ssc post# 339055

Thursday, 06/11/2020 5:10:48 AM

Thursday, June 11, 2020 5:10:48 AM

Post# of 361239
We are in an argumentation-loop it seems:

"And in spite of any and all bullish dreaming, there is still no one willing to pay more than 1/10 of a penny for erhe and it has been that way for over 3 years."

There is no bullish dreaming by TOTAL.

Again: shall we wait for news?

If anything that shorters have claimed was even remotely factual, actual and realistic, ERHC would have been left for dead by everybody involved, years ago. The opposite seems to be the case.

Somebody funded the litigation trajectory for ERHC, and they still saw existing potential in ERHC. I'm sure they came to that conclusion after extensive Due Diligence... (probably by looking at the share price for 1 hour straight, without blinking their eyes...)

I explain that: the entity or person(s) that paid for, and invested time into the 400+ pages of litigation regarding just EEZ block 4 alone, probably (understatement of the millenium) has the majority of the ERHC shares already. Otherwise it would not have been worthwhile for this insider to start and fight this lengthy court-process. ERHC would have simply filed for bankruptcy.


The Doctor.