Tuesday, June 09, 2020 11:53:33 AM
LBHI and the Judge should fear the covenant more than a Waske Appeal. Although the Waske Motion leads to a covenant argument. The covenant have been effective all along. That is the danger for LBHI. I am assuming LBHI denied they knew about the covenant. That had to be the reason for letter #2.
Wu is up to something. If there is misconduct, letter 1 and letter 2 makes sense. Ignoring the covenant is a misconduct if it stands that its enforceable. By placing us in 10b does not take away anything from the guarantee or the covenant. It's just our claims are in 10b.
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM