InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 2202
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/06/2001

Re: None

Saturday, 12/16/2006 2:23:35 PM

Saturday, December 16, 2006 2:23:35 PM

Post# of 447362
Some information on the liberal media.

http://www.mediaresearch.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0603/p02s01-usgn.html
Journalists know they're liberal:
In 1995, 22% of journalists told Pew they were liberal, and 5% conservative. Now (2004) it's 34% and 7%, respectively.
So, when liberals claim no bias, they believe that Americans and Journalists do not know what they are talking about; they seem to call everyone dumb -even themselves.

Rarely, liberals (Journalists & networks) will shy away from true discussion forums as "Hannity & Colmes" because it is a threat to their bias. Americans are not fooled by the myth of the "liberal bias myth". Liberal media want to think for everyone, and the secret is out.


Some Liberal Arguments:

1. Some liberals will be so desperate as to claim a "Pat Robertson" is a massive media outlet like the NY Times or Reuters. Liberals evidently are in total denial. Pat Robertson may be equivalent to an individual journalist, but not a media outlet. Let's compare apples or oranges, okay, libs?
2. The media is owned by "conservative" corporations.

This is an absurd lie. TIME WARNER is the largest media company in the world!
http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/timewarner.asp

How does one judge a corporation to be "conservatively" biased? Because of tax incentives? Profitability? "Liberal" corporations don't care for profits? Let's ask the founder of Time Warner, Ted Turner, a noted liberal flamer that was once married to "Hanoi" Jane Fonda, the huge liberal activist.

God forbid that the truth come out that Time Warner is the Parent Company OF Time Magazine, Time Warner Cable (a cable service provider), CNN, CNN HEADLINE NEWS, TNT, AOL, TBS).


Liberals (Journalists - Media Owners) who report the news are so adament about getting their views and/or lies out, they will continue to report them even if it means that the network/journalist is killing the ratings. How else can you explain the Dan Rather controversy? A man who clung to fabricated documents with a network that refused to admit the lies they reported.

The facts are alarming. However, we in America are in a better position than are neighbors across the pond. Britain has no Fox News, it only has liberal networks like the BBC.


I'm sorry that you liberals hate Fox News in your lineup. Most Americans disagree. We have to put up with biased groups like Time Warner Networks, NY Times, LA Times, CBS, Reuters, and AP, not to mention a bunch of rabid leftist political hack journalists. Fox News does have open debates on their network between liberals and conservatives. I would dare say that Fox news has more liberal voices than the other major networks having conservative voices combined.

So, next time I hear a liberal crying about Fox News, I'll play a little violin while I'm free to turn the radio to O'Reilly and turn CNN off.

GREAT EXAMPLE LEFTIST JOURNALISM
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/10/14/D8D824KO4.html

Someone trying to demonize C. Rice?
http://fromthepen.com/condi_usatoday_scandal.html

Lengthy story on pictoral edits by the media
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003177.htm

Paule Walnuts



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.