InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 4518
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/28/2006

Re: ssc post# 338944

Friday, 06/05/2020 5:46:54 AM

Friday, June 05, 2020 5:46:54 AM

Post# of 361151
SSC person,

It seems I need to repeat common sense remarks into oblivion:

"To top it off, "insider buying on steroids" is now the latest addition to the ever changing bullish narrative."

But true nonetheless.

"At least that one should be easy to prove - just look at the SEC disclosure filings of erhc insider buying."

Oh, wait... maybe it is an outsider who is behind the litigation! Eh, wait again... maybe it is an outsider with less than 5% ownership that is behind the litigation trajectory!

Now, you indeed need proof to substantiate such a bizar suggestion... lol. It isn't particularly drenched with common sense, is it?

I gave shorters the advice to memorize a quote days ago:

I explain that: the entity or person(s) that paid for, and invested time into the 400+ pages of litigation regarding just EEZ block 4 alone, probably (understatement of the millenium) has the majority of the ERHC shares already. Otherwise it would not have been worthwhile for this insider to start and fight this lengthy court-process. ERHC would have simply filed for bankruptcy.

ERHC is without a doubt hugely undervalued, an insurmountable problem for shorter who franticly try to change tide, on a daily basis, and get some substantial volume on the board. Not very successful obviously. But... tommorrow is another day.

Reread why ERHC is undervalued: 338924

The Doctor.