As you can see, KMP, the sleuthing skills here can't stand up in a court of law. That's because the scientific process is adhered to there as well! There is a process of what's admissible as evidence, as well as what is evidence.
If they filtered everything through Carl Sagan's Baloney Detection Kit, they would be a whole lot less confused.
If you say good things, you are a shill. Doesn't pass Carl Sagan's Baloney Detecton Kit, but it's a their litmus test. INADMISSABLE.
If you are asked, are you still beating your wife, no objection is allowed. Just a yes or no will suffice. As in, how many shares have you been paid?
Err, if an insider buys stock, that means the stock will go up. If they sell stock, that means the stock goes down. It's a good predictor of the future in their world. Even though it doesn't work, and sounds like a Don Lapre commercial.
So, I think you know how things work around here now.
