Home > Boards > US OTC > Banking and Finance > Fannie Mae (FNMA)

I used to think the first reason was

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
kthomp19 Member Profile
 
Followed By 28
Posts 4,307
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/16
160x600 placeholder
Fed Asks BlackRock to Direct Billions in Bonds -- WSJ Dow Jones News - 3/25/2020 3:02:00 AM
Federal Reserve Taps BlackRock to Purchase Bonds for the Government Dow Jones News - 3/24/2020 6:09:00 PM
Federal Reserve Taps BlackRock to Purchase Bonds for the Government Dow Jones News - 3/24/2020 6:07:00 PM
Federal Reserve Taps BlackRock to Purchase Bonds for the Government Dow Jones News - 3/24/2020 6:04:00 PM
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac to Stop Accepting Libor Mortgages Dow Jones News - 2/6/2020 2:29:00 PM
Firms Warn of Risks in Plan to Take Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Private Dow Jones News - 11/24/2019 6:00:00 AM
JPMorgan Deal Shows Possible Path to Smaller Fannie and Freddie Dow Jones News - 11/8/2019 8:29:00 AM
Banks Get Ready For Privatization Of Fannie, Freddie -- WSJ Dow Jones News - 10/24/2019 3:02:00 AM
The White House Wants to Privatize Fannie and Freddie. It Needs Wall Street's Help. Dow Jones News - 10/23/2019 12:14:00 PM
Banks Moving Flood-Based Mortgage Risks Out of Private Sector, Paper Finds Dow Jones News - 10/1/2019 4:37:00 PM
Altria, Fannie Mae, Nike: Stocks That Defined the Week Dow Jones News - 9/27/2019 6:09:00 PM
Top 4 Penny Stocks to Watch This Week InvestorsHub NewsWire - 9/16/2019 12:35:00 PM
Fannie, Freddie to Consider Alternatives to FICO Scores--5th Update Dow Jones News - 8/13/2019 11:02:00 PM
Fannie, Freddie to Consider Alternatives to FICO Scores--3rd Update Dow Jones News - 8/13/2019 4:10:00 PM
Fannie, Freddie to Consider Alternatives to FICO Scores--2nd Update Dow Jones News - 8/13/2019 3:50:00 PM
Fannie, Freddie to Consider Alternatives to FICO Scores--Update Dow Jones News - 8/13/2019 2:58:00 PM
Fannie, Freddie to Consider Alternatives to FICO Scores Dow Jones News - 8/13/2019 2:42:00 PM
Fannie, Freddie to Consider Alternatives to FICO Scores Under New Rule Dow Jones News - 8/13/2019 2:32:00 PM
kthomp19   Saturday, 05/23/20 04:27:53 PM
Re: Potty post# 611049
Post # of 613565 
I used to think the first reason was important, but I am no longer so sure about that. Sweeney dismissing all direct claims (so far) and Calabria's seeming assurance that the administration's actions will take care of the lawsuits makes me think that said actions will get the cases dismissed as moot, which wouldn't require a settlement with plaintiffs.

The second reason is brand new as of Wednesday, but is of critical importance. Calabria's inclusion of a separate CET1 capital standard, which includes common but not preferred equity, clearly signals two things:

1) The capital raise will be mostly or all commons. I have said that not doing so would cause the capital structure to be too pref-heavy, and Calabria's CET1 standard proves this correct. This post I wrote last year, especially point #5, is looking rather prescient on this count in light of the new capital rule.
2) A junior-to-common conversion is beneficial because while it doesn't add to core (tier 1) capital, it does add to CET1 capital.

The third reason is the most important of all. Since the capital raise will have to be at least mostly commons, those new common shareholders will want as little liquidation and dividend preference in front of their new commons as possible. Converting the existing juniors is a costless way to eliminate $33B of the former and $2B of the latter. If I were a re-IPO investor, I would insist on there being a conversion of the existing juniors first.

The only party with any power that might object is Treasury, because the conversion would dilute its warrant shares; I don't see the juniors agreeing to a conversion while the warrants are outstanding. However, Treasury allowed its Citi warrants to be diluted by a pref-to-common conversion, and Treasury has other ways to make money in the recap and release process than maximizing the value of its warrant shares at all costs; commitment fees on the backstop are the biggest one.

In light of the second and third reasons, no others are needed. Calabria and Mnuchin have both said that a conversion is possible, and it will quickly become apparent (once prospective re-IPO investors are consulted) that it will be necessary for recap and release.



Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist