InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 4572
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/24/2018

Re: LETSWIN2020 post# 103843

Thursday, 05/21/2020 12:09:51 AM

Thursday, May 21, 2020 12:09:51 AM

Post# of 145727
In theory there are several reasons. Here’s a semi related question. Why would there need to be a clause indemnifying PWC et al against legal action EXCEPT in the cause of negligence or fraud? Here’s a hint:: if the story being touted as fact by some were true there’s be no reason for said indemnification. If they outright lied (read that didn’t happen) they would be exposed to action . The only reason that makes sense then is that the purposefully elusive wording of the documents due to confidentiality reasons (proven by the numerous redacted documents and CTs) could lead some people’s misinterpretation of the documents as a sign of actionable offenses. The ones who sold early don’t deserve any of the cash if any is coming.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.