InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 4110
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2017

Re: Patswil post# 609132

Friday, 05/15/2020 11:34:02 PM

Friday, May 15, 2020 11:34:02 PM

Post# of 794281
"Arrowwood case was about direct claims only--not derivative--ruling was as expected"


"This court agrees with the reasoning and conclusion in Sisti: The FHFA does not shed its government character when acting as conservator because it does not step into the shoes of the Enterprises. Otherwise stated, the FHFA-C is the United States because it retains the FHFA’s government character. Plaintiffs’ claims, therefore, are against the United States for purposes of the Tucker Act. -USFC"

The problem with Plaintiff's direct claim is Jurisdiction of court. The USFC lacks jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ claim that sounds in tort. US regular District courts have jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ claim that sounds in tort.