InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 778
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/18/2003

Re: kpf post# 35931

Thursday, 12/14/2006 5:20:13 PM

Thursday, December 14, 2006 5:20:13 PM

Post# of 151812
kpf,

What I was getting at is CPU-Z of this revision does not know Brisbane by name, unless its revision history is incomplete.

This [revision history is incomplete] may be the case. If you download rev 1.7 and 1.8 of CPU-Z and examine the .EXE file using some editor, you will find the string "Brisbane". So the writers of the CPU-Z knew about the name at least. Now whether they interpret the CPUID information properly is another issue. If it is handled properly, then the big question is, why Rev F and not Rev G? Is AMD trying to pass off Windsor cores on 65nm? I don't understand.

IMHO
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News