my favorite Nickulliana post:
UW86 you are correct. She does have some splaining to do. Did you ever get a response?
Posted by: uw86
In reply to: None Date:12/14/2006 9:39:27 AM
Post #of 216968
my favorite Nickulliana post:
Posted by: kruy
In reply to: nickulliana who wrote msg# 209517 Date:12/8/2006 4:41:49 PM
Post #of 216461
Nickulliana: I've been reading your posts since you arrived on this board (around August) and things are becoming more and more disturbing regarding your involvement here.
Lets recap:
First you show up this summer as a gung ho long making constant pump posts.
Then, a few weeks later, you have this emotional/dramatic falling out with Chad/Chiphlder of MAM, after which you became an instant basher and turning this into a personal soap opera for weeks between you and Chad claiming he hurt your feelings/friendship and claiming all was not as was supposed to be in RE this stock and MAM, and claiming you (lived?) only a short distance (miles) from MAM and Chad.
Somewhere around this time you also started using a different alias, claiming some sort of Ihub screwup.
Then you started chumming around with some of the other notorious longs on this board along with suddenly exchanging secretive and personal "text messages" and phone calls with Petar at all hours of the day and night, and being very cryptic about the whole thing, during which you of course, became very BULLISH and LONG on the stock again with some peculiar "born again" insight into this stock.
Then, after Petar deliberately did not deliver the date certain AF's (and being bullish and defensive of Petar till the last minute) you suddenly became a bearish basher again, along with claiming some sort of breach of friendship with Petar.
This whole time, you mysteriously seemed to be not only informatively right in the middle of things, but physically in the middle of things constantly with all the heavy hitter players involved, no matter what the location.
Then you mysteriously and secretively show up at the meeting that Stockhog and Airys had set up, in which all of the "in the know" players here seemed to know about and even cryptically referenced to (such as Jim Bishop who kept throwing out that he knew someone else was at the meeting) and you never acknowledged until after the fact.
Question: Are you, as someone had alluded to earlier today, a paid runner or informant for the South Florida people?
I doubt if you actually answer this truthfully if at all, just pointing out that your entire existense on this board has been manifestfully and painfully suspicious to an utmost transparent degree, as well as your constant flip flopping on the stock depending on the status of personal relationships with the big hitters involved in this stock.
Anything you care to come clean on??
Just using a "happy hour" post, so I won't be responding any time soon if at all. Just want to point out, you have some explaining to do.
