Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Wise Man]

We finally know the reason why judge Sweeney is reluctant to lift the stay in all the cases. Today's analysis on #Fanniegate is explained that it could be due to the brief of Amicus Curiae filed by a FMCC shareholder on April 20th. Although it was filed in the Washington Federal and WAZEE cases, all of them form the Related Actions attached to Fairholme case. Thus, this brief is also relevant to all the cases as a whole. By keeping the cases in stay, judge Sweeney can argue that she isn't aware of any brief because the proceedings are in stay (stoppage of the case). But it turns out that directing the plaintiff Fisher last Friday to file a motion to certify her Dec 6th opinion while in stay, instead of lifting the stay to enable it, could be deemed a breach of the Court process and the judge can be expelled from the U.S. judiciary for corruption. STORY DEVELOPING