Better for a board to be dead than to be very active and run by a manipulator who deletes opposing points of view so that only his "Buy! Buy! Buy!" nonsense gets seen and the appearance is given that nobody can come up with reasons not to bet the farm on the company.
I'm glad we disagree on this.
How's UMCC doing these days, anyway? Oops. Just checked. Looks like an alltime low. At least, for all of the time that QCharts is showing me. And what's with that span of time in which it looks like it had zero trades? Looks like that ended around the 23rd of June or so. Unless QCharts is screwing up, which wouldn't surprise me. Was the ticker temporarily different or something? I don't keep up with that company.
In hindsight, do you still think it was okay to delete negative posts solely because you felt the content of them was wrong? Do you feel responsible for the losses of people who bought on seeing only positives in the way I'd hold her accountable if I shorted it and lost big because she were deleting all positives about it?
If I were Matt, I'd show you the door and let you go piss and moan about it on Raging Bull.
Were you working for the competition during your month-long rein as dictator?
Of course not. Oh, and it was 6 weeks. Not a month. And I wasn't a "dictator". Dictators don't voluntarily step down as I did. You were one of the people I specifically didn't want sullying my good name by association.
Not sure why you'd ask your rhetorical question about "the competition". What do you mean?
Now, what say you go make a contribution somewhere to this site that Matt so generously allows you to use, rather than running off at the mouth about things you don't know squat about, eh?
